Focus on GSA 6 (Spanish Mediterranean) and the Adriatic (GSAs 17-18)
12,368 hauls in 18 GSAs; 959 in GSA 6 (gold). Hover over a haul for its details; scroll to zoom.
Q1 · What drives where red mullet lives?
Question How do depth and bottom temperature shape red mullet biomass in the two areas?
Approach Spatio-temporal species distribution model (sdmTMB) of survey biomass, 2014-2021, in each area
Result Biomass falls steeply with depth and rises with bottom temperature: +17% per °C in the Adriatic. In GSA 6 the temperature effect is uncertain, as surveys there cover a narrow range of temperatures.
Predicted biomass relative to each area’s mean bottom temperature, at constant depth, with 95% confidence bands.
Q2 · Do heatwaves change red mullet biomass?
Question Is red mullet biomass lower in summers with strong marine heatwaves?
Approach Annual biomass index from the model, compared with summer heatwave intensity, 2014-2021
Result In the Adriatic, biomass drops in the two strongest heatwave summers (2015, 2018) and recovers the next year; in GSA 6 it does not (ρ = 0.53). A hypothesis to test, not yet a result.
Standardised annual series. Shaded: the three strongest heatwave summers of each area.
Q3 · Do trawlers respond to heatwaves?
Question Do trawlers fish more, less or elsewhere in strong heatwave summers?
Approach Daily trawler effort (GFW) in 3 strong vs 3 weak heatwave summers since 2015, in each area
Result No change: same total effort (+1.9% in GSA 6, -1.3% in the Adriatic) and same grounds. An earlier apparent increase came from AIS coverage growing in 2012-2014.
Core fishing grounds (80% of hours): blue-grey in both types of summer; red strong only; dark blue weak only.
Take-home
Main results
Depth and bottom temperature structure red mullet biomass; warmer bottoms hold more fish within the sampled range
Adriatic biomass dips in strong heatwave summers; GSA 6 does not
Trawlers do not change effort or grounds in heatwave summers
Limits
Eight years per area; heatwaves defined from sea surface temperature
AIS coverage grew until 2015: trends before then are partly artefacts
Model predictions, not observations, underlie the trends
Discussion points
Heatwaves may change red mullet availability to the survey rather than its abundance
Are bottom temperature anomalies a better heat signal than surface heatwaves?
Ways forward
Heatwave intensity as a covariate of the model, fitted to the hauls
Effort on heatwave days vs other days, from daily AIS data
Uncertainty of the biomass index; extend to more areas
Both models converge; observed vs fitted r = 0.90 (GSA 6) and 0.88 (Adriatic)
GSA 6
GSAs 17-18
Per +100 m depth
−94%
−68%
Per +1 °C bottom temp.
+18%
+17%
Largest |ε|
0.7
2.9
Bottom temperature: two areas compared
+17%biomass per +1 °C in the Adriatic (95% CI +14% to +21%)
+18%per +1 °C in GSA 6 (95% CI −4% to +45%): not significant
Discussion point: GSA 6 hauls span a narrow range of bottom temperatures, so the effect is poorly constrained there and depth dominates.
Biomass index
−3%GSA 6, 2015 → 2021 (Tweedie GAM: −12% in density)
77% to 146%The Adriatic index fluctuates more, between 77% and 146% of its 2014-2021 mean
Discussion point: each area peaks in its least-sampled year (GSA 6 2020: 39 hauls; Adriatic 2017: 61). Needs index standard errors.
Habitat suitability index (HSI)
Fixed effects (depth + bottom temperature) rescaled to 0-1 within each area. Highest on the shallow inner shelf; in the Adriatic, the northern basin scores high almost everywhere.
Change in habitat suitability, 2014 to 2021
GSA 6: median +0.1%, almost no change
Adriatic: median −1.8%; 63% of cells lose suitability, mainly the northern basin
Discussion point: the % change explodes where HSI ≈ 0 (up to +217% in one GSA 6 cell): prefer the HSI difference or a 2014-2021 trend.
Overlap between red mullet and trawling
Local correlation between red mullet and GFW trawling effort, by year
Red: trawling concentrated where red mullet is abundant
GSA 6: mostly negative, positive patches on the outer shelf
Adriatic: a positive band through the north-western and central basin every year
Discussion point: correlations near ±1 are common in small windows: add a significance test or a whole-area overlap measure.
Marine heatwaves in the two areas
Summer heatwaves (Hobday et al. 2016) computed on the prediction grid of each area
GSA 6 strongest summers: 2017, 2018, 2020
Adriatic strongest summers: 2015, 2018, 2019
Discussion point: the two areas do not share their heatwave years (2020: strong in GSA 6, almost none in the Adriatic), so comparisons need area-specific years.
Heatwaves, biomass trends and trawling trends: GSA 6
Trends 2014-2021 per cell, as % of the cell’s mean per year; grey: not significant (p ≥ 0.05). Significant biomass trends: 3% of cells; none after correcting for multiple tests.
Heatwaves, biomass trends and trawling trends: Adriatic
Grey in A: no SST data north of 45°N. Significant biomass trends: 12% of cells; none after correcting for multiple tests.
Trawling in strong and weak heatwave summers
Daily GFW trawler effort, June-August, 3 strong vs 3 weak summers, from 2015
Total hours: +1.9% in GSA 6, -1.3% in the Adriatic, within year-to-year noise
Do the fleets fish the same grounds?
Core grounds (cells with 80% of hours): blue-grey in both types of summer, red strong only, dark blue weak only.
GSA 6
Adriatic
Overlap D, strong vs weak
0.72
0.72
Overlap D, same type
0.71, 0.7
0.71, 0.72
Centre shift
1.4 km
3.9 km
Effort on red mullet hotspots
13% / 14%
23% / 20%
Same grounds in strong and weak heatwave summers: overlap as high as between two summers of the same type (D: 1 = identical effort distribution).
Heatwaves and red mullet biomass across years
Adriatic: biomass drops in the two strongest heatwave summers (2015, 2018), recovers the year after; overall ρ = -0.14
GSA 6: the opposite, its strongest heatwave summers are among its higher-biomass years (ρ = 0.53)
Discussion point: eight years per area, two areas in opposite directions: a hypothesis to test, not a result.
Heatwaves and red mullet biomass within years
Year-specific deviation of predicted biomass (ε) in each cell, against heatwaves and trawling, with depth, latitude and year in the model
GSA 6: small effects
Adriatic: not monotonic, a dip at moderate heat, higher biomass in the hottest cells
No trawling effect in either area
Does not reproduce the annual dips
Marine heatwaves and fleet behaviour
Hobday et al. (2016) detection with heatwaveR, summer events only
Strongest summers: 2017 (46.6 °C·days), 2020, 2018; none in 2014 and 2016
56% of cells show more trawling in heatwave summers, but non-heatwave years include low-AIS 2013-2014. Contrast 2016 vs 2017 instead.
Climate-fisheries vulnerability index
Mean of three 0-1 scores: heatwave exposure + habitat loss + fishing pressure
Hotspots off Cap de Creus-Roses and nearshore off the Ebro and Valencia
Exposure from 2021 only: 71% of cells score exactly 0
Pressure very skewed: median score 0.08
Better: 2015-2021 mean exposure, log effort, test the weights
AIS coverage changes over time
49% → 98%hauls with matched AIS effort, 2012 → 2021
The 2012-2014 rise reflects AIS adoption, not more fishing. Comparisons spanning these years partly measure AIS uptake: start in 2015 or use effort per vessel.
Collinearity among predictors
Total fish model: bottom salinity dropped (VIF 3.1; r = 0.79 with depth)
Red mullet model: all VIF ≤ 1.9
Residual diagnostics
Total fish (Gaussian, standardised residuals)
k-index ≈ 1 for all terms (all p ≥ 0.20)
Red mullet (Tweedie, simulated quantile residuals)
Good overall fit; zero-catch hauls often predicted at several hundred N/km²
Red mullet and depth
Occurrence and mean density by haul depth, GSA 6 MEDITS hauls 2012-2021